This prompted the idea for a, yet unwritten, children’s book in my imagination: Two rather proud coast-bound landowners are boasting about which of them has the more impressive farm and one refers to his island, the other scoffs saying that’s no island, just a lump of rock. Rather unceremoniously an otherwise contented sheep is pulled from the comfort of her flock and deposited on the island/lump of rock in question to settle the matter. I saw this as a way to explore the trivial, uncaring attitude some big business has towards nature and the frustration of being one of the small and powerless at the whim of power. Grass aside, not to mention the fact that to make life worth living, perhaps our sheep has other needs. There would also be a cute cast of sea birds and seals and views of this little bit of land through the seasons of a year. Somewhere in there is the exploration of the value of nature.
Does nature have a value?
If so, how do you measure the value of nature?
If there are different ways to measure its value, how do they compare?
One dominant measure of nature’s value, now widely questioned, is purely as a material resources for humans to exploit. One counter to this, beginning in the 19th century, led to the protection of natural environments and the establishment of national parks – recognising the value of just letting nature do its thing – which leads to another value being our enjoyment of these unspoiled preserves. Contemporary research is recognising the value of nature in terms of our wellbeing – nature prescriptions, to counter nature deficit disorder are growing in popularity. One measure, that I think has a place somewhere in many hearts and minds is the incalculable value of nature as a place that has an equal right to be.
The value of land can be measured in how productive it is (in terms of how it can produce resources, sustainably or otherwise, for humans).
An organic and/or permaculture approach might recognise the value in preserving natures ability to regulate itself without the need for artificial input. Permaculture even recommends putting aside part of the land in a design to just be wild. Another measure of value might be an ecosystem’s biodiversity, a higher biodiversity being a higher value.
A book I read recently (Do We Need Pandas, the uncomfortable truth about biodiversity by Ken Thompson) introduced me to a new measure that I hadn’t come across before of Ecosystem Services. (Tony Juniper’s new book What Has Nature Ever Done For Us focusses even more on this.) Ecosystem Services are the functions that nature carries out, that benefit us humans, that we don’t have to pay for – if we did have to pay for them, the cost might be many billions of pounds. The pollination services of bees add so many billions to the economy etc etc.
These ‘services’ are coming under more scientific scrutiny so that the values arrived at by the research have some rigour. All in all I think this way of measuring nature’s value has some real benefits. This doesn’t push against a materialistic, anthropocentric world-view, it goes with it saying, ‘Wake up – join the dots, if money is important to you, recognise what nature is already doing’. ‘Save the forests. Don’t pollute. Preserve as large an area of virgin ecosystem as possible.’
I see this thinking (and both books) as really interesting. I’ve added ‘ecosystem services’ to the landscape reading workshops I lead but it has left me uneasy in its quantitative rather than qualitative measure – which got me thinking. How can you use the fascinating observations from ecosystem services and nature capital as a spiritual exercise and one idea that sprang to mind is as inspiration for giving thanks. Take humble soil for example, dirt. Has thanking God for the soil ever taken a prominent place in your prayers? What if you consider what soil does, as a kind of meditation:
This barely scratches the surface of only one element of the natural world. Apply the same thinking to trees and forests, ecosystems such as prairie or bogs, rivers and seas, living things such as bees or vultures or plankton. For me nature is God’s creation, full of grace and thinking in this way brings science and spirituality together in an illuminating way.
Please bookmark this post at Facebook or Twitter:
It’s so sad that all religions don’t put more awareness into this subject. One day our grandchildren are going to wake up in a toxic waste land.
For me, not only is nature’s God’s creation, but it is a part of us that we are slowly killing.
#2. By Joshua Tilghman on March 12, 2013
Encountering the Eternal One within the ancient boundaries of Sherwood Forest More ...
We seek to find the presence of God in the open air and in nature, and to connect with the Divine Being who is present in creation. We seek to foster a love of creation, a love which will lead us to care for it. We look for reconciliation between nature and human beings, and within human relationships. More ...
oxforddiocese:
Great to see how @RiponCuddesdon are engaging with @ARochaUK Eco Church scheme - love the Forest Church area made b… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
18 Aug 22
YBS_Church:
Our Forest Church takes place on Sunday, 28th August, at 4.30pm in the Gifford Community Woodland (Fawn Wood), for… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
19 Aug 22
rebeccaBug:
Tremeirchion have their first Forest Church service tomorrow so the boys thought they had better check out that the… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
20h
Fascinating idea for a children’s book. There’s an ancient tradition of sheep parables as a way to point out injustice to those in power. The prophet Nathan confronted King David’s royal overreach with a story about sheep (2 Samuel 12). So there’s a certain poetic symetry in using a story about sheep to confront corporations. After all, they are the heirs to royalty’s excess and domination.
This isn’t a coincidence. It was kings who set up the first corporations as Douglas Rushkoff points out in the first Chapter of his book, “Life, Inc”: “By issuing corporate charters, kings could empower those most loyal to them with permanent control over their colonial regions or industries.” First chapter here: http://boingboing.net/2009/05/11/life-inc-chapter-one.html
#1. By Tim Nafziger on March 07, 2013